<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DEBT domains &amp; deals on SNAP / You need to SEARCH better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newfoundnames.com/snapnames/debt-consolidation-domains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newfoundnames.com/snapnames/debt-consolidation-domains/</link>
	<description>Popular articles on domaining, website development, seo techniques and domain name investment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 02:24:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debt Settlement Program</title>
		<link>http://www.newfoundnames.com/snapnames/debt-consolidation-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-12167</link>
		<dc:creator>Debt Settlement Program</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newfoundnames.com/?p=915#comment-12167</guid>
		<description>I actually bought www.debtsettlementprogram.net after becoming aware of the name on your site.  I am very happy I did.  The site will be complete in the next couple weeks and will be used to generate debt settlement leads.  I think I have done a very good job of developing it and figure that my biggest downside is that I can sell it in the future.  Do you think that is correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually bought <a href="http://www.debtsettlementprogram.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.debtsettlementprogram.net</a> after becoming aware of the name on your site.  I am very happy I did.  The site will be complete in the next couple weeks and will be used to generate debt settlement leads.  I think I have done a very good job of developing it and figure that my biggest downside is that I can sell it in the future.  Do you think that is correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.newfoundnames.com/snapnames/debt-consolidation-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-9385</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newfoundnames.com/?p=915#comment-9385</guid>
		<description>Alan,

Great post...keep them coming!   I did notice that a lot of good names were being listed from BuyDomains on Snap, but I didn&#039;t realize that Fabulous was also selling names there...and the names that I&#039;ve been seeing are really good quality!

I found a few this week listed under bin (buy it now), which I believe were priced just right (and I didn&#039;t have to look through a drop list:-)).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan,</p>
<p>Great post&#8230;keep them coming!   I did notice that a lot of good names were being listed from BuyDomains on Snap, but I didn&#8217;t realize that Fabulous was also selling names there&#8230;and the names that I&#8217;ve been seeing are really good quality!</p>
<p>I found a few this week listed under bin (buy it now), which I believe were priced just right (and I didn&#8217;t have to look through a drop list:-)).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.newfoundnames.com/snapnames/debt-consolidation-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-9384</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newfoundnames.com/?p=915#comment-9384</guid>
		<description>Aaron,

thanks - great question!

I&#039;m going to write a post about my thoughts on this in the next day or two. A lot of different scenarios in place here but yes, you are on to something here that actually has happened to people before.

will update a comment here when its live.

Alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron,</p>
<p>thanks &#8211; great question!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to write a post about my thoughts on this in the next day or two. A lot of different scenarios in place here but yes, you are on to something here that actually has happened to people before.</p>
<p>will update a comment here when its live.</p>
<p>Alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.newfoundnames.com/snapnames/debt-consolidation-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-9383</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newfoundnames.com/?p=915#comment-9383</guid>
		<description>Hi Alan, 

I appreciate the development twist in many of your blog posts. 

Although not really on-topic to this post, a blog comment from ‘Mark’ on June 11 in your TLD/Keyword Domains post has really stuck with me, and I was hoping you could elaborate on your reaction to his advice for newbies about building out hundreds of minisites.

Although the “plan” is a shitload of work, I’ve got no problem with that, and I know I can find enough domain names to fit that common product/1000 searches/$1+CPC criteria – either via hand reg, or for a nominal purchase price. What pitfalls do you see to the “plan’s” viability? 

Quite frankly, I fear Google, and the possibility that a couple hundred sites into this plan, they’ll say, “hey, this company/individual surely can’t be producing that many quality sites…..they must be spam…..let’s just de-index everything they own”. 

Thanks in advance for any thoughts. 

Aaron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alan, </p>
<p>I appreciate the development twist in many of your blog posts. </p>
<p>Although not really on-topic to this post, a blog comment from ‘Mark’ on June 11 in your TLD/Keyword Domains post has really stuck with me, and I was hoping you could elaborate on your reaction to his advice for newbies about building out hundreds of minisites.</p>
<p>Although the “plan” is a shitload of work, I’ve got no problem with that, and I know I can find enough domain names to fit that common product/1000 searches/$1+CPC criteria – either via hand reg, or for a nominal purchase price. What pitfalls do you see to the “plan’s” viability? </p>
<p>Quite frankly, I fear Google, and the possibility that a couple hundred sites into this plan, they’ll say, “hey, this company/individual surely can’t be producing that many quality sites…..they must be spam…..let’s just de-index everything they own”. </p>
<p>Thanks in advance for any thoughts. </p>
<p>Aaron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

